对托马斯·K·鲍尔、菲利普·布莱登巴赫和克里斯托夫·M·施密特评论《“歌剧魅影”还是“欲望都市”》的回应

Response to the comment ‘“Phantom of the Opera?” or “Sex and the City”’ by Thomas K. Bauer, Philipp Breidenbach, and Christoph M. Schmidt

Labour Economics · 2015
被引 2
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

回应了对作者2011年论文中识别策略的质疑,提供进一步论证和实证证据,证明以巴洛克歌剧院位置作为高技能人才集聚工具变量的有效性。

Abstract

In our paper “The Phantom of the Opera,” published in this journal in 2011, we introduce proximity to a baroque opera house location as an instrument for concentrations of high-skilled individuals today. In the second stage, we assess productive spillovers from these high-skilled individuals attracted by cultural amenities. Thomas K. Bauer, Philipp Breidenbach, and Christoph M. Schmidt challenge our identification strategy in their comment. In our response, we provide further arguments and empirical evidence for the unambiguous validity of our strategy.

巴洛克歌剧院高技能人才集聚生产性溢出工具变量有效性