Valuing Environmental Policy Options: A Case Study Comparison of Multiattribute and Contingent Valuation Survey Methods
介绍了一种名为“价值整合调查”的新评估方法，通过参与者表达的目标和权衡来估值环境政策选项，并与条件估值法在俄勒冈州原始森林火灾控制选项估值中进行案例比较。
This paper describes a promising new evaluation approach, called a "value integration survey, " that uses the objectives and tradeoffs expressed by participants to value environmental policy options. This constructive technique, which builds on the interactive elicitation process of decision analysts, assists stakeholders in clarifying their values and in agreeing on a policy alternative. The paper compares this multi attribute valuation method to contingent valuation surveys, describes the sequence of respondents' tasks, and presents results from a case study comparison of contingent valuation and value-integration survey methods in the context of valuing options for fire control in Oregon's oldgrowth forests.