The End of the Stockholm School
分析1937年奥林提出瑞典独立发展出就业理论后，斯德哥尔摩学派及其动态方法为何未获国际认可，基于伦德伯格博士论文指出原因包括对均衡分析不感兴趣、偏好个案分析及缺乏分析工具。
In 1937, Ohlin argued that the theory of employment had been developed independently in Sweden. Why then were the Stockholm School and, specifically, its original contribution-the dynamic method-unable to achieve an international breakthrough? On the basis of an analysis of Erik Lundberg's dissertation Studies in the Theory of Economic Expansion (1937), it is suggested that the lack of acceptance was due to the following characteristics of the Stockholm School: disinterest in equilibrium analysis, a preference for casuistic analysis, and lack of instruments for analyzing the questions posed by the School itself.