Low-Wage Employment Subsidies versus the Welfare State
论证了对雇佣低工资员工的企业提供补贴，以降低失业率并提高弱势群体工资，并指出福利国家体系的副作用使这一补贴方案更具必要性。
This paper is a brief for the introduction of a subsidy to any qualified firm for its use of low-wage employees as a means to reduce the unemployment and raise the pay of disadvantaged workers. There would be a case for such a wage subsidy in all the advanced market economies, and certainly the American one, regardless of recent trends. The case has grown stronger, however, with the worsening of the relative wages and especially the unemployment rates of low-age workers. The globalization of investment and the bias of technical progress are the causes most often suggested. I would add the growth of the system-the public entitlements to hospitalization, to retirement and disability insurance, and to the benefits labeled welfare in the narrow sense. Since this factor tends to be overlooked, I devote Section I to it. Section II proceeds to the case for a low-wage employment subsidy. It will be clear that the beneficial effects of the subsidy on disadvantaged workers are the mirror opposite of the harmful side effects of the system, side effects that the subsidy would counteract. I. Side Effects of the Welfare System