组织科学中的概念与实证混淆:解释与讨论

Conceptual and empirical confounds in the organizational sciences: An explication and discussion

JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR · 2014
被引 33
人大 AABS 4

中文导读

指出组织行为研究中普遍存在概念定义与测量重叠的混淆问题,并讨论如何通过预防措施减少这类错误,对研究者和方法论学者有参考价值。

Abstract

Summary Confounding occurs when the definitions and measurements of constructs overlap. It is considered a fundamental flaw in both conceptualizing and testing relationships between variables. Although this logical and methodological error is well known, we argue that a significant amount of the published research and models of organizational behavior is undermined by definitional (i.e., conceptual) and subsequent measurement confounds. Throughout this article, examples of confounding are described. The article ends with a discussion of preventive measures that can be taken to reduce both the conceptual and measurement errors that result from confounding. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

组织行为研究方法心理学统计学