Consequences of Using Different Question Formats in Contingent Valuation: A Monte Carlo Study
通过蒙特卡洛实验比较了条件估值法中公投和支付卡两种提问格式的回归参数和支付意愿估计，发现支付卡模型在效率和均方误差上优于公投模型，但无偏性上两者无显著差异。
Monte Carlo experiments were conducted to compare regression parameter and willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates using the contingent valuation method's referendum and payment-card questioning formats. Strategic bias was controlled by making responses consistent with the true WTP. Two WTP models were constructed: linear and log-linear in explanatory variables. Based on the efficiency and mean-squared-error criteria, the payment-card model was superior to the referendum model. However, neither model outdid the other when the unbiasedness criterion was used. The performance of either model depends on the choice and distribution of the bids and payment-card categories.