UNLOCKING THE KEY TO BIODATA SCORING: A COMPARISON OF EMPIRICAL, RATIONAL, AND HYBRID APPROACHES AT DIFFERENT SAMPLE SIZES
比较了生物数据问卷中经验、理性和混合三种评分方法在不同样本量下的效度，发现理性方法效度最低，混合方法在小样本时最佳，经验方法在中样本时最佳，逐步回归加权在大样本时最佳。
The criterion‐related validities of empirical, rational, and hybrid keying procedures for a biodata inventory were compared at different sample sizes. Rational keying yielded the lowest validities. Hybrid keying performed best at the smallest sample sizes studied, followed by empirical keying at moderate sizes, and stepwise regression weighting of items at the largest sample sizes.