Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis.
回顾30项使用Hunter等人方法的元分析，发现研究者常混淆置信区间与可信区间，导致对变量关系的结论矛盾。
A review of 30 meta-analyses that have been conducted in organizational behavior and human resource management using procedures described by Hunter, Schmidt, and Jackson (1982) suggests that there is confusion regarding the use and interpretation of confidence intervals and credibility intervals. This confusion can lead to conflicting conclusions about the relationships between variables