罚金和监禁是否被有效使用?来自联邦欺诈罪犯的证据

Are Fines and Prison Terms Used Efficiently? Evidence on Federal Fraud Offenders

Journal of Law & Economics · 1995
被引 35
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

研究检验了联邦欺诈罪犯的罚金和监禁刑期是否遵循最优惩罚理论,发现刑期与危害正相关,罚金与支付能力正相关,且高罚金对应短刑期,支持了量刑中的优化倾向。

Abstract

Optimal penalty theory predicts that, because imprisonment is costly and fines are costless, fines will be used to the maximum extent possible before they are supplemented with imprisonment. If criminal procedure functions as a market system, as some observers have suggested, then optimizing models of sanctions may be viewed as positive and not just normative descriptions of criminal sentencing. This article examines the use of fines and prison terms to punish federal fraud offenders. We find that prison terms depend strongly and positively on harms, while fines depend strongly and positively on ability to pay. In addition, individuals punished with higher fines receive shorter prison terms, a finding that supports efficient punishment over some of its alternatives. These results demonstrate optimizing tendencies in sentencing, even if not optimality itself.

联邦欺诈最优刑罚理论罚金与监禁替代量刑效率