An Empirical Comparison of Approaches for Quantitatively Assessing the Content Adequacy of Paper-and-Pencil Measurement Instruments
实证比较了三种收集和两种分析内容充分性数据的方法，发现结果既有相似也有差异，并提出了未来使用和研究的建议。
Despite content adequacy being essential for valid measurement, a well-delineated quantitative method for its examination only recently has become available. Using this new approach, an empirical comparison of three methods of collecting and two methods of analyzing content adequacy data is presented. It is shown that these different methods yield results that have not only substantial similarities but also some differences. Several recommendations for future use and future research are presented and discussed.