Fairness and Redistribution: Reply
回应Di Tella和Dubra的评论，澄清Alesina和Angeletos模型中两种不同的多重均衡，并证明其结论在替代投票机制下依然稳健。
This paper responds to the comment of Di Tella and Dubra (2013). We first clarify that the model of Alesina and Angeletos (2005) admits two distinct types of multiplicity: one that is at the core of their contribution, and a separate one that is at work in Di Tella and Dubra's example. We then proceed to show how Alesina and Angeletos's results are robust to alternative specifications of the voting mechanism.