荷兰人对行为观察量表、行为期望量表和特质量表的反应

Dutch Reactions to Behavioral Observation, Behavioral Expectation, and Trait Scales

GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT · 1995
被引 23
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

荷兰管理者和程序员评估了行为观察量表、行为期望量表和特质量表在八个标准上的表现,发现用户更偏好行为观察量表,结果与美国研究类似。

Abstract

Dutch managers and computer programmers appraised the performance of a subordinate or peer, respectively, using Behavioral Observation scales (BOS), Behavioral Expectation scales (BES), and Trait scales, and then evaluated the three appraisal instruments on eight criteria: ability to give feedback, ability to differentiate, objectivity, position differences, ability to provide training, setting corporate-wide standards, ability to set goals, and overall ease of use. Users preferred the BOS to the BES on seven criteria, and to the Trait Scale on all but two criteria. They preferred the Trait Scale to the BES on two criteria, namely, ease of use and position differences, and considered the BES and Trait scale equivalent on the remaining criteria. These findings parallel those found in a similar study conducted in the United States.

绩效评估行为观察量表行为期望量表特质量表跨文化比较