Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2 × 2 Games: Reply
回复了Brunner等人对Selten和Chmura(2008)的评论，纠正了计算错误并扩展了五种平稳概念在实验数据上的比较，发现行动抽样均衡和收益抽样均衡优于量化反应均衡，而脉冲平衡均衡至少与量化反应均衡表现相当。
This is a reply to “Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2 X 2 Games: Comment” by Brunner, Camerer, and Goeree which corrects some computational errors in Selten and Chmura (2008) and extends the comparison of five stationary concepts to data from previous experimental studies. We critically discuss their new findings and relate them to the data of Selten and Chmura (2008). We conclude that the parametric concepts of action-sampling equilibrium and payoff-sampling equilibrium perform better than quantal response equilibrium, and that the non-parametric concept of impulse-balance equilibrium performs at least as well as quantal response equilibrium.