Further Understanding Spatial Inertia: A Reply to Plastria and Rosing
回应Plastria和Rosing的评论，指出其部分批评不相关，同时承认数学框架方面的意见有一定价值。通过重新分析韦伯最优点的局部行为并强调概率解释，结合经验观察，坚持原论文关于空间惯性的结论基本正确。
Our position with respect to Plastria and Rosing's comments isqualified. Some of their comments are irrelevant because they attack a general statement that is not included in Tellier and Vertefeuille's paper (1995). Portions of their comments on the mathematical framework are relevant and have some implication for the validity of the mathematical relations proposed. A new analysis of the local behavior of the Weberian optimum is presented and its probabilistic interpretation is emphasized. On the basis of this analysis and ofempirical observation, we maintain that Tellier and Vertefeuille's paper was generically correct with regard to spatial inertia.