IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH THE LPC SCORE IN LEADER MATCH?
识别并检验了Fiedler、Chemers和Mahar的《领导者匹配》自学手册中LPC分数使用的问题，指出因常模不完善和量表条目变更，当前程序导致个体被错误归类为高LPC的偏差。
Some problems with the use of the LPC score in the Fiedler, Chemers, and Mahar Leader Match self‐teaching book were identified and examined. The cutting scores defining high and low LPC were questioned because of inadequately developed norms and the alteration of the LPC scale from 16 to 18 items. The current procedures were estimated to create a substantial bias toward being inappropriately categorized as a high LPC individual.