A taxonomy of technological settings, with related strategies and performance levels
根据生产方式、创新速度和产品复杂度将企业分为六类，并发现这些类别与现有概念类型中的原型相关，但不同类别的盈利能力无显著差异。
Abstract In this study, businesses were categorized into six groups on the basis of their methods of production, rates of innovation, and product sophistication. Technology, strategy, and performance‐related variables were then used to successfully relate these categories to archetypes in three existing conceptual typologies. Although the strategies of the six groups differed significantly, their profitability levels did not.