Compensating Differences and Interregional Wage Differentials
利用1976年PSID微观数据，估计美国四地区的享乐工资方程，发现全职劳动者的真实工资决定因素在地区间不变，支持补偿性差异理论，与多数基于宏观数据的研究结论不同。
Interregional differences in average wages and earnings have been observed particularly in the North and South of the United States ever since the mid-1800s. That observation has motivated several empirical attempts to determine the source of those differentials, measured both in nominal and real terms, and to explain why they have been maintained over time. The general conclusion reached by the overwhelming majority of these studies is that the labor market has not eliminated these wage differentials even in the face of substantial interregional migration. This result has at least two alternative interpretations. First, it would appear to contradict the theory of compensating differences as applied to the labor market (Thaler and Rosen, 1975), which stresses that under the assumptions of perfect information, free geographic and intersectoral labor mobility, and homogeneous consumer tastes, the nominal wage rates of workers who have similar human capital characteristics, live and work in similar environments and experience similar living costs, are driven to equality. Second, this result may only reflect an aggregation error. In other words, there may be several types of labor that are each paid different equilibrium wage rates and comprise different percentages of the workforce in each region. Even if the real wage paid to each class of workers is interregionally invariant, a situation that instead would support the theory of compensating differences, failure to distinguish accurately between labor types could produce the illusion of a wage differential. This paper considers the two alternative interpretations given above as to why interregional wage differentials might exist. Hedonic real wage equations are estimated for four regions of the United States using observations on individual household heads drawn from the 1976 Panel Study in Income Dynamics (PSID). This sample is of interest because the 1976 PSID data contain unusually detailed measures of education, work experience and occupation, as well as information on workplace and job characteristics. Thus, a more complete specification of the wage equation is permitted and the possibility of aggregation error is reduced, particularly in comparison with other interregional wage differential studies. Several of these studies, for example, have been based on aggregate data from the Census of Manufactures (Fuchs and Perlman, 1960; Gallaway, 1963; Scully, 1969; and Coelho and Ghali, 1971) which provide no direct measurements on the human capital of workers. The remainder of the discussion is organized into three sections. Section II specifies the wage equation and describes the PSID data. Section III, then, reports empirical results which are consistent with the findings, based on aggregate data, of Bellante (1979) and Coelho and Ghali (1971) in that they support the theory of compensating differences. More specifically, for full-time workers, the rewards to attributes relevant in determining real wages apparently are interregionally invariant. However, because this result conflicts with most previous research on interregional wage differentials based on aggregate data and virtually all such research based on microdata (Welch, 1966; Hanoch, 1967; Hanushek, 1973, 1981; Hirsch, 1978; and Sahling and Smith, 1983), a number of empirical comparisons are made between the present study and the approaches taken by other investigators. Conclusions and implications are drawn out in section IV.