Planting Flexibility and Land Allocation
推导了竞争作物间的盈亏平衡价格关系，说明种植灵活性选择如何影响种植决策，并分析差额补贴是否与种植选择挂钩对决策的影响。
Abstract Break‐even price relationships between competing crops ate derived to illustrate how planting flexibility alternatives affect planting choices. The primary factor differentiating among flexibility alternatives is whether deficiency payments are linked to planting choices. If they are, target prices, program yields, and, in some cases, acreage reduction programs affect net returns comparisons and crop competition. Deficiency payments may be separated from the planting decision on some land either by removing deficiency payments for the acreage involved or by continuing them regardless of the crop planted. Planting choices then would be based on expected net returns from the marketplace.