平权政策中的性别、阶级与种姓分歧:印度妇女预留法案的奇特案例

Gender, Class, and Caste Schisms in Affirmative Action Policies: The Curious Case of India's Women's Reservation Bill

Feminist Economics · 2002
被引 11
人大 A-ABS 2

中文导读

探讨印度妇女预留法案为何在1996年后被三届政府搁置,分析性别、种姓与阶级分歧如何导致平权政策产生反弹效应。

Abstract

Following the introduction of economic liberalization policies in 1991, India has registered steady gains in terms of conventional economic indices such as external trade, investment inflows, and foreign exchange reserves. However, globalization has also caused the feminization of poverty. To counter this trend of marginalization of women, it is necessary to address the gender imbalance in decision-making positions. A Constitutional Amendment Bill seeking 33 percent reservation for women in parliament and state legislatures has, however, been scuttled by three successive governments since 1996, even while each party swears by its commitment to gender equity. The reasons for this curious schism showcase a classic example of gender-class-caste alignments and divisions, under political compulsions. This paper examines this ongoing gender-caste-class imbroglio, in the context of Indian affirmative action policies (economic, social, political), which have generated "backlash" reactions.

印度女性预留法案种姓阶级平权政策