A Comment on “The Citation Impact ofFeminist Economics”
评论Frances Woolley关于《女性主义经济学》引文影响力的文章，指出其遗漏了重要异端经济学期刊，且对主流期刊和经济学家的评价不够批判，并利用十本异端和十本主流期刊的引文数据填补这些空白。
Abstract This essay is a comment on“The Citation Impact of Feminist Economics”by Frances Woolley, which appeared in Feminist Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3, November 2005. This contribution comments on Frances Woolley's recent Feminist Economics article, “The Citation Impact of Feminist Economics.” It points to two avenues through which Woolley's article could have better illuminated the extent of Feminist Economics' scholarly relationship with the communities of both heterodox and mainstream economists: first, she omits several important heterodox economic journals in her study, and second, she could have offered a more critical evaluation of mainstream journals and economists relative to Feminist Economics and feminist economists. This paper uses citation data drawn from ten heterodox and ten mainstream journals to identify and build on these gaps.