Allocation of individuals to job levels under rationing
扩展了有序响应模型，考虑个体报告的实际与期望工作级别差异，并检验仅关注就业者可能产生的偏差，发现失业者并不比就业者更挑剔，且女性较低的工作级别不能由能力利用配给解释。
Abstract We augment an ordered response model for the job level at which individuals desire to work with allowance for individual reporting of a discrepancy between actual and desired job level, and we also investigate possible biases from restricting the observations to the employed, and omitting the unemployed. We find that the latter bias can be ignored and interpret this as evidence that the unemployed are not choosier than the employed. People claiming inadequate capability utilization are not markedly differently allocated than those claiming a proper match. Women's lower job levels cannot be explained from rationing by capability utilization.