无旁支付博弈的价值:当前概念的一些困难

Values for Games without Sidepayments: Some Difficulties with Current Concepts

Econometrica · 1980
被引 63
人大 A+FT50ABS 4*

中文导读

考察了Harsanyi的稳定讨价还价解和Shapley的A-转移值两种无旁支付博弈解概念,通过反直觉例子说明它们与理性玩家假设不一致。

Abstract

Two solution concepts for games without sidepayments are considered: the stable bargaining solution proposed by Harsanyi [6, 7], and the A-transfer value first proposed by Shapley [19]. Some examples of games are considered for which both solution concepts yield results which are highly counter-intuitive, and which seem to be inconsistent with the hypothesis that the games are played by rational players.

稳定谈判解A-转移值无旁支付博弈反直觉结果