Searching for a Model of Multiple‐Site Recreation Demand that Admits Interior and Boundary Solutions
批评了八种休闲需求模型处理边界解的能力，推荐了重复嵌套Logit、多项份额和Kuhn-Tucker三种模型，适用于多地点且数据包含大量边界解的情况。
Abstract For most recreation demand data sets, different individuals visit different subsets of the available sites. Interior solutions (i.e, individuals who visit all recreational sites) are not the norm. Boundary solutions (i.e., individuals who do not participate, or who visit some, but not all, of the sites) predominate. We critique eight demand models in terms of their ability to accommodate boundary solutions. Three models are recommended for consideration when there are multiple sites and the data set includes a significant number of boundary solutions: a repeated nested‐logit model, a multinomial share model, and a Kuhn‐Tucker model.