Content, Process, and the Matthew Effect Among Management Academics
研究了管理学者学术活动中的内容贡献与过程贡献，分析了马太效应如何影响他人对学者活动的看法，并提出了学者类型模型。
This article concerns the sociology of management as a science. Different types of cosmopolitan activities are examined: content (direct contribution to content of scholarly knowledge), process (indirect contribution to scholarly knowledge) and mixed activities. The nature and consequences of the "Matthew Effect" (advantage leads to advantage) are detailed as it affects the perceptions by others of an individual academic's activities. Archetypes of management academics are developed and include the Involved Scholar, the Distant Scholar, the Association Loyalist and the Local (or Marginal Cosmopolitan). A model of the consequences of content, process and mixed content/process is presented. Professional implications to thefield of management are examined and extensions of the analyses suggested. Making the model operational is touched upon.