INTERVIEW NOTES AND VALIDITY
通过三项实验研究了选拔面试中笔记行为及笔记内容对评分效度的影响，发现自愿记笔记者评分更有效，但强制记笔记时效果不同，且行为类笔记有助于提高效度。
Three studies were conducted investigating the effects of notetaking behavior and the content of notes on validity in a selection interview. Overall, results indicate that when notetaking was voluntary, notetakers made more valid ratings than non‐notetakers. But, when note‐taking was manipulated non‐notetakers made ratings that were just as valid as raters told to take behavioral notes, and actually more valid than those raters instructed to take general notes. With regard to the content of notes, behavioral‐type notes were found to contribute to greater validity. In addition, in the first and third study, procedural type notes resulted in lower validity. These results may have important implications for interviewer training for notetaking.