回顾:早期供给侧与需求侧之争:配第、劳、坎蒂隆

Retrospectives: An Early Supply-Side–Demand-Side Controversy: Petty, Law, Cantillon

Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2010
被引 10
人大 A-ABS 4

中文导读

回顾了17-18世纪三位经济学家配第、劳和坎蒂隆关于供给侧与需求侧宏观经济的早期争论,对理解当代经济学流派分歧有参考价值。

Abstract

Early modern Europe in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries witnessed an unprecedented increase in the rate of economic growth, and governments entertained a wide range of proposals aimed at developing and harnessing foreign trade and emerging financial markets. In his magisterial survey of foreign trade doctrine titled Studies in the Theory of International Trade (1936), Jacob Viner pointed out that enlightened authors of that time were often nonbullionist mercantilists: they favored export promotion and import reduction not on the grounds that it would lead to an accumulation of gold, but on the grounds that it would increase trade and employment. My focus here is on how some key economists of this time period—William Petty, John Law, and Richard Cantillon—adumbrated disputes between supply-side and demand-side macroeconomics that have continued to the present day.

重商主义供给与需求威廉·配第约翰·劳理查德·坎蒂隆