A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies revisited
重新检验了Miller和Roth提出的制造战略三分法（守护者、营销者、创新者），发现其部分成立但底层维度不成立，且营销者在1990年代被设计师战略取代，全球数据中还出现了三种新战略。
Abstract While our field has done commendable work putting forward new ideas in operations strategy, we have historically done a less effective job validating concepts after their introduction. Given this issue, we attempted to test and extend one of the most influential OM configurations — Miller and Roth’s [Management Science 40 (1994) 285] taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Their taxonomy was longitudinally replicated with a newer set of North America Manufacturing Futures data as well as an entirely different global sample. Our replications partially supported Miller and Roth’s taxonomy of three strategy‐types ( Caretakers , Marketeers , and Innovators ), but found no evidence of the two underlying dimensions of manufacturing strategy that they called market scope and differentiation. Interestingly, the Marketeers were replaced in the 1990s by a new strategy called Designers , and three other unique manufacturing strategies were identified in the global data.