重新思考经济学:经典著作的潜在贡献

Rethinking economics: the potential contribution of the classics

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 2006
被引 9
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

探讨主流经济学为何排斥“联合”这一社会秩序原则,指出其源于理性选择框架无法容纳承诺能力,并借助亚当·斯密的同情概念及经典著作,论证这些思想对当代社会经济问题的启示。

Abstract

Mainstream views only admit two solutions to social order--separation and coercion. Understanding why association, as a principle of order came to be excluded calls for an incursion into the history of economic ideas. Association was dismissed because it depends on commitment--a human capacity that cannot be accommodated within the rational choice framework. The classics were aware of that. We argue that rational choice, as it was originally conceived, was not meant to be applied to contexts charged with moral force and social dilemmas. We next highlight sympathy in the work of Adam Smith as the basis for normative commitment and association. Finally, we discuss association in the light of several classic contributions and stress the relevance of these contributions to present-day debates and socio-economic challenges. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

社会秩序理性选择同情经典经济学