不披露作为合同救济:解释预告通知之谜

Nondisclosure as a Contract Remedy: Explaining the Advance-Notice Puzzle

Journal of Labor Economics · 1997
被引 10
人大 AABS 4

中文导读

构建模型解释为何现实中同时存在有预告通知和无预告通知的雇佣合同,发现工人无法放弃辞职权是决定合同类型的关键,强制要求预告通知可能损害各方利益。

Abstract

Prior theoretical work predicts an underprovision of advance-notice contracts stemming from their enforcement costs. In the present model, it is rather the fundamental inability of workers to alienate their right to quit taken in conjunction with parameters central to job separation decisions that jointly determine the mix of notice and no-notice contracts observed in equilibrium. Not all equilibrium contracts are efficient but there is no underprovision of notice. Mandating notice cannot improve on joint value and indeed may reduce it. Furthermore, although a mandate can be merely redistributive, there are cases in which it harms all parties. Copyright 1997 by University of Chicago Press.

提前通知合同辞职权合同效率强制通知