Symposium on the Economics of Liability
研讨会梳理了美国责任体系的经济学认知，指出其作为补偿和保险手段成本高昂、效率低下，且诉讼交易成本巨大，整体设计不利于经济效率。
Has the U.S. liability system run amok? Many commentators feel it has, as do many executives who feel that the liability “tax” discourages innovation and ultimately fails to promote safety. On the other hand, economists have ceaselessly pointed out that when one party is made liable for injury caused to another, an externality has been internalized. This symposium is intended to clarify just what economists know about the U.S. liability system: its worth as well as its flaws. The resulting picture is not a pretty one. Often liability is imposed on injurers as a means of compensating and insuring victims, despite the fact that such compensation and insurance could be accomplished much more effectively using direct accident insurance. Liability is an expensive means of providing compensation, since the legal liability system involves large transaction costs, mainly in the form of litigation expenses. Overall, America's institutions for assigning liability are poorly designed to promote economic efficiency.