Knowledge for Theory and Practice
探讨了理论与实践之间差距的三种观点：知识转移问题、知识类型差异和知识生产问题，并提出参与式学术方法，既能增强研究对实践的关联性，又能推动领域知识进步。
We examine three related ways in which the gap between theory and practice has been framed. One approach views it as a knowledge transfer problem, a second argues that theory and practice represent distinct kinds of knowledge, and a third incorporates a strategy of arbitrage--leading to the view that the gap is a knowledge production problem. We propose a method of engaged scholarship for addressing the knowledge production problem, arguing that engaged scholarship not only enhances the relevance of research for practice but also contributes significantly to advancing research knowledge in a given domain.