收益管理是否已被接受?

Has Revenue Management become Acceptable?

JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH · 2003
被引 287
人大 A-ABS 4

中文导读

研究了餐厅中五种需求定价策略(如优惠券、分时段定价)在三个国家(新加坡、瑞典、美国)的公平性感知,发现折扣框架能提升接受度,但桌位定价可能引发负面反应。

Abstract

Demand-based pricing is underused in many service industries, because customers are believed to perceive such pricing as unfair. Fencing can be highly effective in improving the perceived fairness of demand-based pricing. In this study, five fences were explored in a restaurant context across three countries (Singapore, Sweden, and the United States). Demand-based pricing in the form of coupons (two for the price of one), time-of-day pricing, and lunch/dinner pricing were perceived as fair. Weekday/ weekend pricing was seen as neutral to slightly unfair. Table location pricing was seen as somewhat unfair with potential negative consumer reactions to this practice. Furthermore, framing demand-based pricing as discounts improved perceived fairness. The findings were largely consistent for the three countries. Specifically, framing demand-based pricing as discounts or gains showed no country-specific effect.

收益管理定价策略消费者感知服务行业跨文化研究