Post‐Keynesian Economics and Agriculture: Discussion
讨论了三篇关于后凯恩斯经济学与农业的论文，指出Shaffer的论文虽主题重要但缺乏理论，未能提供更现实的食品系统描述。
The three papers we have heard are most challenging and interesting. Since they are quite different in their perspectives, they do not lend themselves to an integrated discussion. Hence, I will discuss each of them separately. Shaffer's paper, although focused on an important topic, is both frustrating and disappointing. The title of his paper suggests that he will take initial steps toward a conceptual framework that presumably will do a better job of describing the food system than we have had in the past, and which will give us a sounder and more comprehensive basis for evaluating the performance of the food system. In point of fact, however, there is little theory in the paper, or little which in my judgment takes us very far in terms of having a more realistic or more general description of the food system.