VALUING RURAL RECREATION BENEFITS: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES
比较了条件价值评估法和旅行成本法在估算苏格兰中部女王伊丽莎白森林公园游客非市场游憩效益中的应用，并指出了两种方法的问题。
Two methodologies for valuing non‐market benefits (contingent valuation and the travel cost method) are briefly described. Both are then applied to the problem of valuing non‐market recreation benefits derived by visitors to a part of the Queen Elizabeth Forest Park in Central Scotland. Results, in terms of consumer surplus estimates, are presented for each method, and problem areas found in applying the two methodologies are pointed out.