Language, Meaning, and Games: A Model of Communication, Coordination, and Evolution: Comment
评论了Demichelis和Weibull（2008）的研究，指出其结论（只有高效结果在演化中稳定）是由偏好的不连续性而非小谎言成本本身导致的，并讨论不连续性在演化模型中为何不具吸引力。
Demichelis and Weibull (2008) show that adding lexicographic lying costs to coordination games with cheap talk yields a sharp prediction: only the efficient outcome is evolutionarily stable. I show that this result is caused by the discontinuity of preferences rather than by small lying costs per se. Finally, I discuss why discontinuity may not be an appealing assumption in evolutionary models.