The CAPM is Wanted, Dead or Alive
反驳了Kothari等人关于年度β与平均收益关系更强、以及幸存者偏差夸大账面市值比效应的观点，指出幸存者偏差无法解释账面市值比与平均收益的关系，且年度与月度β对β溢价的推断一致，但β本身无法解释预期收益，因此CAPM模型无效。
ABSTRACT Kothari, Shanken, and Sloan (1995) claim that β s from annual returns produce a stronger positive relation between β and average return than β s from monthly returns. They also contend that the relation between average return and book‐to‐market equity (BE/ME) is seriously exaggerated by survivor bias. We argue that survivor bias does not explain the relation between BE/ME and average return. We also show that annual and monthly β s produce the same inferences about the β premium. Our main point on the β premium is, however, more basic. It cannot save the Capital asset pricing model (CAPM), given the evidence that β alone cannot explain expected return.