PERSPECTIVE—Collective Intelligence in the Organization of Science
认为科学领域不应只追求共识，而应借鉴集体智慧文献，通过多样性和理论张力来评估科学社区的健康度。
Whereas some suggest that consensus is the desirable end goal in fields of science, this paper suggests that the existing literature on collective intelligence offers key alternative insights into the evolution of knowledge in scientific communities. Drawing on the papers in this special issue, we find that the papers fall across a spectrum of convergent, divergent, and reflective activities. In addition, we find there to be a set of ongoing theoretical tensions common across the papers. We suggest that this diversity of activities and ongoing theoretical tensions—both signs of collective intelligence—may be a far more appropriate measure than consensus of the health of a scientific community.