Note—On Anomalies in Dynamic Ratio Type Scheduling Rules: A Clarifying Analysis
指出Adam和Surkis提出的纠正动态比率调度规则异常的方法有误，澄清了异常产生的原因，并给出一个能防止该异常的新规则。
Previous authors have shown that dynamic ratio scheduling rules do not always behave as intended. A recent proposal by Adam and Surkis (Adam, N. R., J. Surkis. 1980. Priority update intervals and anomalies in dynamic ratio type job shop scheduling rules. Management Sci. 26 (12, December) 1227–1237.) to correct such anomalies is shown to be in error. The reason why such anomalies occur is clarified and a rule which prevents such anomalies is presented.