Empirical Likelihood in Causal Inference
将经验似然与矩方法结合，利用三个估计函数得到平均处理效应的局部有效且双重稳健的估计量，比增广逆概率加权估计更有效，并考虑了回归方法。
This paper discusses the estimation of average treatment effects in observational causal inferences. By employing a working propensity score and two working regression models for treatment and control groups, Robins et al. (1994 Robins , J. M. , Rotnitzky , A. , Zhao , L. P. ( 1994 ). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed . Journal of the American Statistical Association 89 : 846 – 866 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1995 Robins , J. M. , Rotnitzky , A. , Zhao , L. P. ( 1995 ). Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data . Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 : 106 – 121 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) introduced the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) method for estimation of average treatment effects, which extends the inverse probability weighting (IPW) method of Horvitz and Thompson (1952 Horvitz , D. G. , Thompson , D. J. ( 1952 ). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe . Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 : 663 – 685 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]); the AIPW estimators are locally efficient and doubly robust. In this paper, we study a hybrid of the empirical likelihood method and the method of moments by employing three estimating functions, which can generate estimators for average treatment effects that are locally efficient and doubly robust. The proposed estimators of average treatment effects are efficient for the given choice of three estimating functions when the working propensity score is correctly specified, and thus are more efficient than the AIPW estimators. In addition, we consider a regression method for estimation of the average treatment effects when working regression models for both the treatment and control groups are correctly specified; the asymptotic variance of the resulting estimator is no greater than the semiparametric variance bound characterized by the theory of Robins et al. (1994 Robins , J. M. , Rotnitzky , A. , Zhao , L. P. ( 1994 ). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed . Journal of the American Statistical Association 89 : 846 – 866 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1995 Robins , J. M. , Rotnitzky , A. , Zhao , L. P. ( 1995 ). Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data . Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 : 106 – 121 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Finally, we present a simulation study to compare the finite-sample performance of various methods with respect to bias, efficiency, and robustness to model misspecification.