货币与劳动力:马克思追随黑格尔,还是斯密加斯拉法?

Money and labour-power: Marx after Hegel, or Smith plus Sraffa?

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 1998
被引 5
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

主张在斯拉法批判后,通过恢复马克思的辩证法来保持其资本主义理论的连贯性,摒弃对价格和货币背后独立劳动价值结构的依赖,并以此解释当代金融主导和劳动力市场自由化。

Abstract

Reinstating the dialectic in Marx's account of capitalism is argued to be the best way of maintaining its coherence after the Sraffian critique. The key to this involves purging any reliance upon any autonomous labor-value substructure underlying prices and money. It is shown that adopting this approach opens up rich possibilities for interpretation of contemporary developments such as the increasing dominance of the monetary and financial sectors, and the two decades of liberalization of labor markets. The paper focuses on the appropriate conceptualization of money and labor-power, arguing against the modern classical approach of W. Dixon and G. Kay (1995). Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.

马克思辩证法货币劳动力斯拉法批判