为所有想要工作的人提供工作?为什么新古典劳动供给曲线不适合作为就业与失业理论的基础

Work for all those who want it? Why the neoclassical labour supply curve is an inappropriate foundation for the theory of employment and unemployment

Cambridge Journal of Economics · 2005
被引 21
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

质疑新古典劳动供给曲线在就业与失业理论中的适用性,指出其基于工人可自由选择工作的错误前提,并借鉴琼·罗宾逊的观点,主张在宏观经济分析中摒弃该曲线。

Abstract

This paper questions the usefulness of the neoclassical labour supply curve as a factor in the theory of employment and unemployment. This curve rests on the false premise that workers can 'choose' whether to work or not, and gives credence to the idea that all unemployment constitutes chosen leisure. Despite this, it was used by Keynes to define the point of full employment. This contributed to the misleading impression that the level of full employment is determined by psychological factors. Challenging this view, Joan Robinson sought to integrate a wider set of issues into the theory of labour supply, in order to build a different (non-neoclassical) foundation for Keynes's theory of effective demand. Drawing upon Robinson, the paper argues against the use of the neoclassical labour supply curve within macroeconomic analysis. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

新古典劳动供给曲线就业理论失业理论有效需求