Rhetoric vs realism in economic methodology: a critical assessment of recent contributions
评述了经济方法论中关于修辞与现实主义的新辩论，聚焦三位主要学者，并指出辩论中忽视了一个关键点：重新批判性思考认识论项目的可能性。
This paper reviews the relatively new debate on rhetoric and realism in economic methodology, concentrating on its main exponents: Deirdre McCloskey on the side of rhetoric, Tony Lawson as the advocate of critical realism, and Uskali Mäki, arguing for a combination of rhetoric and realism. The review highlights a blind spot in the debate, namely the opportunity to rethink critically the project of epistemology