Harvard, the Chicago Tradition, and the Quantity Theory: A Reply to James Ahiakpor
回应詹姆斯·阿希亚克波对2002年一篇关于1932年哈佛备忘录与哈里斯基金会宣言关系的批评，指出其误解了强制储蓄学说及这些文献对1930年代芝加哥货币思想起源的意义。
James Ahiakpor's critique of our 2002 work on the relationship between a certain 1932 Harvard memorandum on antidepression policies and the 1932 Harris Foundation manifesto dealing with the same issues misses the significance of these documents, and of the relationships between them, both for the literature of the time, and for later debates about the origins of 1930s Chicago ideas about monetary economics. He is correct to locate these documents in a more general quantity theoretic tradition, but his discussion here is marred by a serious misunderstanding of the so-called forced saving doctrine and its place in that tradition. Finally, Ahiakpor fails to appreciate that the absence of positive policy proposals from the 1934 Harvard studies of The Economics of the Recovery Program, a point that he himself notes, is a major contributing factor to that book's mediocrity.