Van de Ven and Johnson's “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But...
批评范德文和约翰逊提出的“参与式学术”无法解决学术研究对实践者价值低的问题，认为地震科学是商学院研究的更好模式。
Practitioners find little value in academic research. Some see it as a knowledge flow problem; others see practitioner and academic knowledge as unrelated. Van de Venand Johnson propose a pluralistic collective of researchers and practitioners using “engaged scholarship” and intellectual arbitrage to create practitioner-meaningful research. It's a nice dream, but not a solution; bias, disciplines, and particularism remain. Neither discipline-centric nor practitioner-driven research offers a solution. Earthquake science offers a better model for business school research.