The Relationship between "Traditional" Leadership, "Super" Leadership, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
在一家小型制造厂的实地研究中，考察了传统领导力（结构发起和关怀）与超级领导力（自我目标设定、自我观察和自我期望）对组织公民行为五个维度的预测作用，发现传统领导力在所有维度上解释的方差增量均超过超级领导力。
In a field study of a small manufacturing plant, relationships between five dimensions of organizational citizenship and two sets of predictors, "traditional" leadership (initiating structure and consideration) and "super" leadership (self-goal-setting, self-observation, and self-expectation) were examined. Results suggest that traditional leadership contributes incremental explained variance beyond super leadership on all five dimensions of organizational citizenship. Both consideration and initiating structure contributed approximately equally to four citizenship dimensions, whereas consideration contributed most predictive power to the sportsmanship dimension. Super leadership explained no incremental variance in organizational citizenship behavior beyond traditional leadership.