Organizational discourse analysis - well done or too rare? A reply to our critics
回应三位批评者，指出在组织话语分析现状上存在共识，同时讨论本体论问题、还原论特征和先验假设陷阱，并认为批评者可能无意中重复了原文指出的问题。
In this article we respond to Bargiela-Chiappini, Iedema and Mumby.We notice that there is considerable agreement concerning the state of the art of organizational discourse analysis, while also discussing the disagreements. We expand on some of the ontological issues inherent in our argument, further discuss the character of reductionism in organizational discourse analysis, the trappings of a priori assumptions, and, finally, argue that our critics themselves, perhaps inadvertently, tend to repeat the problematic moves we identified in our original article.