献血中的挤出效应:蒂特马斯是对的吗?

Crowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?

Journal of the European Economic Association · 2008
被引 683 · 同刊同年前 5%
人大 AABS 4

中文导读

通过实地实验检验金钱补偿是否挤出献血意愿,发现女性在获得现金补偿时献血意愿下降近一半,而允许将补偿捐给慈善则完全抵消该效应。

Abstract

In his seminal 1970 book, The Gift Relationship, Richard Titmuss argued that monetary compensation for donating blood might crowd out the supply of blood donors. To test this\nclaim we carry out a field experiment with three different treatments. In the first treatment subjects are given the opportunity to become blood donors without any compensation. In the second treatment subjects receive a payment of SEK 50 (≈ $7) for becoming blood donors, and in the third treatment subjects can choose between a SEK 50 payment and donating SEK 50 to charity. The results differ markedly between men and women. For men the supply of blood donors is not significantly different among the three experimental groups. For women\nthere is a significant crowding out effect. The supply of blood donors decreases by almost half when a monetary payment is introduced. There is also a significant effect of allowing individuals to donate the payment to charity, and this effect fully counteracts the crowding out effect.

血液捐赠挤出效应货币补偿性别差异