Lessons from the JMCB Archive
检查了《货币、信用与银行杂志》的在线档案，发现大多数作者未按要求存放数据和代码，导致超过150篇实证文章中只有不到15篇可复制。作者提出改进建议。
We examine the online archive of the Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, in which an author is required to deposit the data and code that replicate the results of his paper. We find that most authors do not fulfill this requirement. Of more than 150 empirical articles, fewer than 15 could be replicated. Despite all this, there is no doubt that a data/code archive is more conducive to replicable research than the alternatives. We make recommendations to improve the functioning of the archive.