国际支付意愿调查:为额外一个质量调整生命年愿意支付多少钱?成本效益阈值是多少?

International survey on willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?

Health Economics · 2009
被引 692 · 同刊同年前 1%
人大 A-ABS 3

中文导读

通过跨国互联网调查,测量了日本、韩国、台湾、澳大利亚、英国和美国民众为额外一个质量调整生命年愿意支付的金额,为成本效益阈值提供科学依据。

Abstract

Although the threshold of cost effectiveness of medical interventions is thought to be 20 000- 30 000 UK pounds in the UK, and $50 000-$100 000 in the US, it is well known that these values are unjustified, due to lack of explicit scientific evidence. We measured willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional quality-adjusted life-year gained to determine the threshold of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Our study used the Internet to compare WTP for the additional year of survival in a perfect status of health in Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Taiwan, Australia, the UK, and the US. The research utilized a double-bound dichotomous choice, and analysis by the nonparametric Turnbull method. WTP values were JPY 5 million (Japan), KWN 68 million (ROK), NT$ 2.1 million (Taiwan), 23 000 UK pounds (UK), AU$ 64 000 (Australia), and US$ 62 000 (US). The discount rates of outcome were estimated at 6.8% (Japan), 3.7% (ROK), 1.6% (Taiwan), 2.8% (UK), 1.9% (Australia), and 3.2% (US). Based on the current study, we suggest new classification of cost-effectiveness plane and methodology for decision making.

支付意愿质量调整生命年成本效果阈值增量成本效果比