Deceptive Field Experiments of Discrimination: Are they Ethical?
讨论了在就业、住房和产品市场中用欺骗性配对测试歧视的田野实验，论证了欺骗被试的合理性，但指出欺骗测试者可能有害且不必要。
SUMMARY Field experiments in which bogus pairs of transactors test for discrimination by applying for employment or housing, or by trading in product markets, have been widely‐published during the last decade. However, no detailed justification has been provided for the deception involved. The general lack of veracity in the market‐place, the social harm inflicted by discrimination and the superior accuracy and transparency of this technique justify deceiving the subjects of experiments. Deception of testers , however, may do them harm, contravenes the ethical standards of psychologists and sociologists and is unnecessary, as alternative procedures are available to deal with ‘experimenter effects’.